“Photoshopped” Images of 50s Pin-up Girls

I am an amateur photographer, and I have Photoshopped.

And I do feel a twinge of guilt when I say that openly.

I had an image in mind, and went to these lengths to create that image, to sharpen what I captured with the lens, to brighten what the light was not sufficient enough to show on its own.

I have Photoshopped people, because quite frankly I work with ideas. I work with archetypes.  Then again we all have our reasons, right? And those reasons sound good to us.

When people think of Photoshop, they think of photographers slimming the waists of their models, removing blemishes, and correcting any “imperfections”. I have done that, yes. My models were aware that we were creating a character, and they were the inspiration.

On the flip side of this character development, I’ve made monsters. I’ve emphasized these so-called imperfections and created so much noise in my images that it is unsettling to the viewer. I was going for that type of response.

I will say that I do not agree with the use of Photoshop for advertisements for products (unnamed anti-aging creams spouting the benefits of their product in decreasing lines, when really the photo editor removed those lines entirely, pixel by pixel). I do not agree with changing a well-known person’s identity/appearance so much that they are almost unrecognizable to themselves (except in the case for character development- but  not for magazine interviews and showcases).

Like Cindy Crawford has said: “I wish I looked like Cindy Crawford.”

It’s easy for all of us, including myself, to blame those who use Photoshop or related products for bastardizing our perceptions of beauty.

That being said, we are following a road well-traveled far before us.

I found an article on PopPhoto discussing what they found about those oh-so-famous pin-up gals from the 1950s. The artist used photographs of models as his base.

Glossed over “imperfections” much?

She looks a bit different.

How do you like this one?

girl with parrot

Great parroting act.

There are ethics in dealing with this sort of issue, and perhaps that will be reflected upon later. Strictly from an artist’s perspective (sans my philanthropist, therapist, humanist sides) , it is just another tool for creation of what we consider an ideal picture.
It isn’t too terribly unlike a paintbrush. A pencil. An eraser. A make-up brush, foundation, and blush. Or an ineffective box of brown hair dye.

See more of the “photoshopped” images here: IMGUR

Advertisements

3 thoughts on ““Photoshopped” Images of 50s Pin-up Girls

  1. I really like this post! Today we see images who have been seriously photoshoped and you lose the essence of the person in the picture. Girls today are exposed to unnatural looking bodies which are made to believe every celebrity, model or actress has.. this makes them feel inadequate and it’s quite unhealthy.. When is the industry going to embrace real natural beauty instead of fake one?

    • I agree. We’ve gone a little rampant with our expectations and/or definitions of “beauty”, which at times are nearly, if not entirely, impossible to achieve. It is amazing how media and ads can compel us to want to look like anything but ourselves, anyway, rather than accentuate what we already are.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s